| |
Combating money laundering:
the financial services implications
The
European Commission is a full member of the FATF, representing the
European Communities (there are 29 other member countries). In 1991,
the Commission adopted Directive 91/308 of 10 June 1991 relating
to the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose
of money laundering, which is frequently quoted as one of the major
international instruments in the field of the fight against money
laundering.
I. THE WORK OF THE FINANCIAL ACTION
TASK FORCE ON MONEY LAUNDERING
The FATF is an intergovernmental body,
which develops and promotes policies, both at the national and international
levels, to combat money laundering. Its primary goal is therefore
to generate the political will necessary for setting up national
legislative and regulatory reforms in this area.
It has drawn up a "blacklist"
of countries considered non-co-operative (Bahamas, the Cayman Islands,
the Cook Islands, Dominica, Israel, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, the
Marshall Islands, Niue, Panama, the Philippines, Russia, St. Kitts
and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines) and a "grey-list"
of countries which, without being deemed non-co-operative, have
insufficient means against money laundering. (Antigua and Barbuda,
Belize, the Bermudas, the British Virgin Islands, Cyprus, Gibraltar,
Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Jersey, Malta, Mauritius Island, Monaco,
Samoa, St. Lucia).
The FATF reports encouraging progress
made by certain countries on the blacklist (Bahamas, the Cayman
Islands, the Cook Islands, Israel, Liechtenstein, the Marshall Islands
and Panama) that may lead to their removal from the list. It also
reports a worrisome delay in countries such as Lebanon, the Philippines,
Nauru and Russia. It is possible that, in its next meeting of June
2001, it may modify these lists and recommend boycott measures against
the countries on the blacklist.
The 40 FATF recommendations
The FATF has published 40 Recommendations,
which are a comprehensive scheme for action against money laundering.
They cover the criminal justice system and law enforcement, the
financial system and its regulation and international co-operation.
FATF members have made a firm political commitment to combat money
laundering based on these recommendations. They have their implementation
of the 40 Recommendations monitored through a two-pronged approach:
an annual self-assessment exercise and the more detailed mutual
evaluation process under which each member country is subject to
an on-site examination. In addition, the FATF carries out cross-country
reviews of measures taken to implement particular Recommendation.
Some of the basic obligations contained
in the Recommendations are:
- the criminalization of the laundering
of the proceeds of serious crimes (Recommendation 4) and the enactment
of laws to seize and confiscate the proceeds of crime (Recommendation
7).;
- the obligation for financial institutions
to identify all their clients, including all beneficial owners
of property, and to keep appropriate records (Recommendation 10
to 12);
- a requirement for financial institutions
to report suspicious transactions to the competent national authorities
(Recommendation 15), and to implement a comprehensive range of
internal control measures (Recommendation 19);
- an adequate system for the control
and supervision of financial institutions (Recommendation 26 to
29);
- the need to enter into international
treaties or agreements and to pass national legislation, which
will allow countries to provide prompt and effective international
co-operation at all levels (Recommendation 32 to 40).
The development of certain money laundering
methods is emphasised: utilisation of on-line banking services,
trusts and other structures not constituted in companies, and involvement
of lawyers, notaries, accountants and other professionals. Concerning
trusts, FATF proposes several solutions: establishing a system of
certification of the professionals involved in the formation of
trusts, regulating the formation of trusts (e.g. having access to
information and authorizing the prohibition of certain trusts),
imposing registration formalities.
II. PROPOSAL FOR AMENDING DIRECTIVE 91/308 RELATING TO THE PREVENTION
OF THE USE OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FOR THE PURPOSE OF MONEY LAUNDERING
Directive 91/308 came into force in
1991. The amendment of the directive is identified as one of the
priority goals of the Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP). These
modifications relate to the concept of serious offences, the scope
of the Directive, non face-to-face operations and co-operation between
the Commission and the national authorities.
a) The concept of "serious
offences"
The main changes to the 91/308 Directive
under the amending directive are the extension of its scope to
the whole organized crime and not only to drugs trafficking. The
Commission proposes that this prohibition should apply to activities
linked to the organised crime or activities damaging the European
Communities financial interests, with possibility for Members
States to extend their national anti money laundering legislation
to any other form of criminal activity.
The Council proposes to enlarge the
scope proposed by the Commission. Its draft aims at excluding
unintentional or innocent involvement from the scope of the Directive
and then defines which crimes must be considered serious. Finally,
as proposed by the Commission, it allows Member States the option
of enlarging the scope in national legislation by defining any
other offence as a criminal activity in the light of the Directive.
During the European Parliament second
reading, the proposal of the Rapporteur, Mr Lehne, to restrict
the definition of money laundering to organized crime was not
adopted. The European Banking Federation (EBF) considers this
vote as prejudicial.
b) The coverage of financial sector
activities and activities outside the financial sector
- Financial sector activities
The 91/308 Directive applies to credit institutions and to financial
institutions in the widest sense. However, there are doubts
about the scope of the directive, notably concerning bureaux
de change, money remittance offices and investment firms. The
Commission proposes to widen the definition of a financial institution
(it has to be ascertained that this wider definition would apply
for the sole purpose of this Directive).
- Activities outside the financial
sector
The 91/308 Directive allows Member States to extend the application
of the directive in whole or in a part to professions and to
categories of undertakings, other than the credit and financial
institutions referred to in article 1, "which engage in
activities which are particularly likely to be used for money
laundering purposes". However, the stronger the money laundering
defences of the banking sector have become, the more money launderers
have sought alternative ways of disguising the criminal origin
of their funds.
The Commission proposes therefore that the directive should
apply to most of other activities and professions, which should
be obliged to properly identify their clients: real estate
sector, accountants, auditors and casinos; some activities
of notaries and other independent legal professionals (specific
financial or company law activities). Conversely it proposes
also that lawyers should be exempted from any identification
or reporting requirement in any situation connected to the
representation or defense of their clients in legal proceedings.
Concerning this last point, the Council Common Position proposed
to clarify that lawyers should be submitted to the Directive
when participating in financial or corporate transactions,
including providing tax advice: here is the greatest risk
for these services to be misused for the purpose money laundering.
However, these professions should be exempted from the reporting
obligation when the information is obtained before, during
or after judicial proceedings, or in the course of ascertaining
the legal position for a client. On the second reading, the
Parliament accepted the Council position.
c) The identification of
customers (physical persons) by credit and financial institutions
in non face-to-face financial operations
To face up to the means of payment
transactions, such as direct banking and pre-paid cards, that
also provide new opportunities for money laundering, the European
Commission has introduced in its proposal an annex about the identification
of customers in a distance transaction.
The objective is that the institutions
and persons subject to this directive shall take the specific
and adequate measures necessary to compensate for the greater
risk of money laundering which arises in non face-to-face transactions.
It is necessary to take account of future developments in the
field of electronic financial services, for example electronic
signatures.
On the second reading, the Parliament
rejected the proposal for an amendment setting forth strict procedures
to be followed by banks for the identification of their customers
in a distance transaction. The EBF considers that the solution
ends up with the proposition of the Council: "a general provision
in the directive imposing on bank the requirements to put in place
adequate measures of identification at a distance, but leaving
some margin for manoeuvre concerning the choice of the measures".
d) Co-operation between the European
Commission and National Authorities
The Commission considers that an
exchange of information concerning money laundering is essential
for the effectiveness of the anti-money laundering effort. It
has proposed such an exchange in case of illegal activities related
to the European Communities' financial interests. But the Council
considers that the question of co-operation between the Commission
and national authorities should not be regulated in this directive
and has requested that the Commission presents a new proposal.
On the second reading, the Parliament
has adopted an amendment calling for Member States and the Commission
to cooperate when the financial interest of the Communities are
affected.
CONCLUSION
It is clear from the above that
both at the world-wide and the EU level, there is a firm commitment
to combat money laundering under all its present forms. However,
the criminal world is always devising new ways of laundering its
illicit funds and the fight against these activities is an on-going
and evolving process. In particular, the financial services industry
has much to say: it is in its utmost interest to collaborate intensively
with law-makers and police bodies in order to combat money laundering,
and it broadly supports the actions of the FATF and the EU's modernization
of its money laundering directive. Not only is it the health and
reputation of the financial services industry which is at stake,
but ultimately the ones to benefit most from a decisive fight against
money laundering are the legitimate customers of the system.
|
for full text in pdf format
|
|
|
|
Secretariat 
|
|